A vendor at a night market agrees on camera to talk about her recipe. The finished vlog uses her clip inside a segment about unpaid stall fees. What is the consent problem?

A learner aged 12 is filmed crying after her classroom floods. The crew has the school's permission. Before her face and name are shown, what is still needed?

A crew reaches a coastal village an hour after a boat sinks. A woman waiting for news waves the camera away, then keeps waiting. The crew films her face in close-up anyway. The decision is:

A creator reviews three study lamps and calls one the best. That lamp's maker paid for the video, and no caption says so. What makes the video unethical?

A documentary shows a jeepney driver waking at 4 a.m. and starting his engine. The crew asked him to wake and start twice for the camera. The narration says the crew simply watched his day begin. What makes this misleading?

A segment on urban flooding cannot film the flood itself, so it hires people to wade through a flooded street while a caption calls the scene a recreation. Judged as ethics, this is:

A clip shows a barangay health worker shouting. The cut shot before it showed her calling across a noisy street to a colleague. The clip runs under narration about staff losing patience with patients. The edit misleads because it:

A news vlog said a school feeding program served 400 learners. The real number is 140, and the video already has thousands of views. What is the responsible action?

One report misspelled a barangay name. Another gave the wrong cause of a fire. Which needs a correction announced on air rather than a quiet fix?

A student officer speaks at a school assembly and is filmed. A classmate in the audience is filmed reacting. Who has the stronger claim to be asked before the clip is posted?

A fisherfolk cooperative pays a creator to film its rice harvest, and the video is honest about the hard parts. Which step is still required?

A night market association pays a creator, and the agreement lets the association cut any scene it dislikes. Which quality does this arrangement damage most?

A report on this year's flooding uses a striking clip filmed three years ago in another town, with no caption saying so. Judge the decision.

A fisherman gives an interview, then messages the crew a week later asking to be dropped because neighbors may react. Nothing has aired yet. The fair response is to:

A learner aged 15 speaks about hunger at home. She agrees and her parents agree. Which detail should still be left out of the finished segment?

A correction is still owed for a published error even if almost no viewer noticed the mistake.

A crew films a health worker walking into the station, then asks her to walk in again for a better angle. The narration says she arrived that morning to open the station, which she did. Is this misleading staging?

A cooperative head says: "The loan helped us at first, but the fees later ate the gains." The vlog airs only the first half. Which principle does the edit break?

A vlog printed a wrong figure because a barangay office handed over an outdated sheet. What should the correction contain?

A camera films a family eating on the floor of a covered court during a flood evacuation. Nobody is asked, and the narration calls the shot proof of need. The ethical failure is: