The police suspect that the robbery was not a sudden decision, but a __________ crime planned weeks in advance.

During the cross-examination, the detective tried to __________ the suspect by asking detailed questions about his whereabouts.

The defendant's lawyer argued that there was no direct __________ connecting her client to the scene of the crime.

Although the primary suspect claimed he acted alone, investigators believe he had __________ who helped him disable the security system.

The forensic experts analysed the trace amounts of __________ collected from under the victim's fingernails.

Because the suspect was out of the country during the break-in, he had a solid __________ that proved his innocence.

After hours of deliberation, the jury finally reached __________ of guilty on all counts.

The suspect was released after providing a solid ________ demonstrating he was in another city on the night of the crime.

Investigators determined that the heist was not a spontaneous act, but rather a ________ operation planned over several months.

The defense attorney advised the witness not to make statements that might ________ him in the criminal plot.

Although she did not carry out the break-in herself, she was charged as ________ for driving the getaway vehicle.